|
KMID : 0377619770320030283
|
|
Korean Jungang Medical Journal
1977 Volume.32 No. 3 p.283 ~ p.295
|
|
|
The Comparative Investigation of the Elementary School´s Feeding Realities of Gyung Sang Bug Do Urban and Rural Area
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
From 1, July 1976 to 31, December, we investigated the school feeding realities and improbable points of one thousand two hundred and forty two elementary school children of Kyung Sang Bug Do urban and rural area, and had following results.
1) The urban example and general schools have school nurse and nursing rooms but the other schools have not such teachers and rooms.
2) The urban example schools and rural self-support schools have school feeding places but the other schools have not such equipment’s.
3) All school feeding rate was 73.83% and that of the rural self-support was the top(98.06%).
4) Among the expense of the school feeding, 72.86% was one´s own expense and the rate of no compensation was no more than 4.26%.
5) The goods of the school feeding was chiefly a kind of bread (53.77°6), the most wanting kind was milk(50.48%), in the wanting rate of milk, the ,urban area(53.29%) was a little more than rural area(47.51%).
6) The number of school feeding day; chiefly rural self-support school was five in a week(83.87%, all day except Saturday) and urban and rural general schools were twice a week.
7) The quantity of school feeding; 77.77% said appropriate, but the urban example (16.71%) and the rural general (12. 24%) said little.
8) The likes and dislikes of goods; common is most(39.77%) and rural general said untasty(39.79%) which is the most high among the untasty.
9) The response of the children´s parents; 83.8% parents answered in the affirmative, but rural general answered relatively negative(41. 15%).
10) The expense of the school-feeding; appropriate (52.41%), expensive (31.72
%) cheap(14.33%), rural general answered expensive (59. 18%) and the urban general answered appropriate(70.95%).
11) The school feeding place; the urban example(96.11%) and the rural self-support(90.32%) answered they eat in the classroom. The urban general(84.15, /) and rural general (69-72%) answered in the school or home. Among the children who bring to home, only 5.55% answered they eat alone.
12) The rate of the children who bring lunch, to the school when school feeding is supplied is 21.65% and the most. high rate is rural general(30.27%)and 93.96% answered they eat it at lunch time.
13) The reason of school feeding; 59.33% answered (for the children´s health !.: and the highest place of its rate is rural self-support (74.51%), contrary the lowest place is urban example (42.68%).
14) The rate of weighing children´s bodies is once or twice(91.29%) and this rate has no difference according to the school.
15) The health state after school feeding; the affirmative who answered,. quite well, well, common is 70.35% and the lowest was rural general (47.27%).
16) Improbable point; more tasty(21.95%) was the highest. Second is to ask. two or more kind of school feeding goods(18.04%), third, wanting bread which is not past its time is 16.04%, fourth is if given everyday (14. 28%).
The children who do not want school feeding are 11. 71% definitely will not eat are 4.9561. Urban example(32. 73%) and rural general(25. 56%) want more tasty goods. Urban general want bread which is not past its time(22.05%) rural self-support want everyday supply (22. 99%) all is the. most highest in its rate.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|
|